CAS emphasizes that Therese Johaug herself should have done better research on the trophodermin ointment.The article is several years old.When the sentence of 18 months' suspension was announced on Tuesday morning, CAS only published a press release with the verdict.On Tuesday afternoon, the verdict, which is 35 pages long, was published on CAS 'website.Here, CAS argues thoroughly why the arbitral tribunal believes Johaug has a greater degree of guilt than what the jury in the Norwegian Sports Confederation concluded.It is especially argued for negligence in using the cream itself.The verdict also includes a picture of the box with the much-discussed doping warning.The panel also observes that the outside of the trofodermin package clearly indicates 'clostebol acetate' as an ingredient.There was no reason to even check a long list of ingredients to know about the important, active ingredient in the product ", it is stated in the judgment.The panel further argues that top athletes have a large, personal responsibility in light of their experience and expected knowledge of anti-doping rules."It is very surprising that Therese Johaug did not do a basic check in view of her extensive experience and success as an international athlete," the verdict states.It is pointed out that Johaug has been through about 140 doping controls, and she should have been aware of the standards that are expected of a practitioner at her level, according to CAS.Johaug should at least have checked the box and done a standard internet search, the judges believe.CAS 'main argument is that Johaug did not do enough to examine the product when she received a clear signal from former national team doctor Fredrik S. Bendiksen.Johaug's defense has mainly been about Bendiksen being an experienced national team doctor, who she believes she had every reason to trust."A majority of the panel disagrees.A practitioner can not delegate his responsibility, she is responsible for what she does to avoid doping ", it is stated in point 195.It is one of a total of three points where reference is made to a majority decision.In the point above, it shines through that the minority took Johaug's side, but in point 230, which applies to the length of the sentence, it does not appear what the minority wanted."Based on an assessment of all the circumstances, the majority in the panel concludes that an exclusion of 18 months is appropriate," writes CAS.Head of Communications Katy Hogg informs NRK that it is not uncommon for dissent in CAS judgments, and she estimates that there are majority decisions in "some judges each year".Majority decisions are not always noted in the judgments as these discussions are often held to the internal considerations, says Hogg.There was also disagreement on item 208, where the panel decided whether Johaug's degree of guilt should be described as "greater", "normal" or "small"."Based on Johaug's total circumstances, the majority in the panel finds that a normal degree of guilt is asserted," the verdict states.The verdict states, among other things, that Johaug had the ointment for twelve days, which was more than enough time to check whether the substances in the ointment were on the doping list, according to CAS.The panel emphasizes that the substances have names that do not require any language skills in Italian."Throwing the information (package) only because it was in a foreign language is definitely not in accordance with the practitioners' duty of care," the verdict states.Before the end of the World Cup in Falun, it is clear that Ole Morten Iversen will not go into a new year as women's national team coach.He thinks some athletes need more enthusiasm, young blood and is now very happy that he is quitting.Bodø / Glimt fixed victory in the first quarter match against Dutch AZ Alkmaar.Ola Solbakken won the match after a controversial penalty in the final minutes.Sturla Holm Lægreid (25) struggled to hit the mark in the Olympics.At the World Cup sprint in Otepää, he impressed NRK's expert with a shooting change that secured a podium place.Tiril Udnes Weng disappeared headlong out of the World Cup sprint in Falun in the prologue on Friday.Afterwards she was angry and upset.She was unlucky, fell and ended up in 49th place.- I do not know what happened.I have ridden well in that turn in training, and thought I should handle it well.But my legs were very stiff, said Udnes Weng according to Expressen."I'm cursed and very sorry," she said.(NTB)Nils Erik Ulset put an end to a long and eventful career with an eighth place in the biathletes' normal distance in the Paralympics on Friday morning.In the finish, he was hailed by the competitors and thrown into the air as a celebration.- The freshman?I was taken to bed.It was then violent, Ulset exclaimed to NRK.He appreciated the tribute from, among others, gold winner Benjamin Daviet and his good friend Mark Arendz.- It's special, that's it.I notice that it will be special not to be a part of it anymore, but at the same time I feel it is time to thank them and let the youth take over, says Ulset.With two extra minutes, it was tough to fight for the medals for the 38-year-old from Tingvoll in the last race of his career.- It is a good race, but there will be no medal in the finish for Nils Erik.It has been a pleasure to follow his fantastic career, summed up NRK commentator Ole Kristian Stoltenberg.Since his debut at the Paralympics in Salt Lake City in 2002, there have been a total of 30 championship medals in the Paralympics and the Paralympic World Championships in North Møre og Romsdal.The Minnesota Wild and Mats Zuccarello landed a 6-5 win over the Detroit Red Wings in the NHL Friday night.The regular game went on in Detroit and the score after the first period was 3-2 to the Detroit team.Zuccarello played in 17.14 minutes and scored one goal in the second period when the away team turned the match around.(NTB)Anyone who thinks they have been affected by illegal publication is encouraged to contact the editorial staff.Pressens Faglige Utvalg (PFU) is an appeals body appointed by the Norwegian Press Association that deals with complaints against the media in press ethics issues.